|
|
|
Newsletter Sign-Up
Testimonials
The SPIDR device is attractive to us at EOR for many reasons. For our St. John’s CO2/Helium project, the information we gather in the evaluation phase of the reservoir is valuable for future development plans going ...
- Jim Skurner, P.E. |
Engineer's CornerTwo-Rate Testing: An Alternative to Build-Ups and DrawdownsBy Mike Redman | Mon, 10 Nov 2008
Pressure-transient
testing is a valuable tool for a reservoir engineer. A properly executed test
will enable the engineer to evaluate one or more of the following well
properties: Skin, Permeability, Reservoir Pressure, Boundaries and Reserves.
Typically these properties are acquired by either conducting a build-up or a
drawdown test. However, circumstances may prevent the well from being shut-in,
negating the possibility of performing either test. In this situation, the
solution is to perform a two-rate test. A two-rate test is advantageous
whenever any of the following is a concern:
By
performing a two-rate test, the operator avoids the loss of cash flow
associated with the shut-in time necessary for either a build-up or drawdown. A
well that is shut in generates no income. Wellbore liquid accumulation is a
concern for wells that would develop a standing liquid column upon shut-in. If
this occurs, reservoir response is masked until the liquids re-inject.
Depending upon the volume of liquid and the kh of the reservoir, this could
take a significant amount of time, making the build-up test an unreasonable
option. During a two-rate test where both rates are above the critical
unloading velocity, this liquid column does not accumulate; the reservoir
response is valid during the entire test. The potential difficulty of returning
a well to production is the final concern. In some instances, after a well has
been shut in for a test, it is difficult or impossible to return the well to
pre-test flow rates. There is little point in running a test if it results in a
permanent reduction of well productivity. Running a two-rate test eliminates
this potential risk. Analysis
of a two-rate test is relatively straightforward. Build-ups and drawdowns are
essentially special cases of a two-rate test, with one of the rates equal to
zero! The permeability equation is the same equation associated with
conventional build-ups and drawdowns: In this formulation of the permeability equation, the flow rate is employed in the calculation is the first rate of the two-rate test. The skin equation is somewhat different due to the fact that it incorporates both rates:
Finally,
the initial reservoir pressure, Pi can be obtained by the following equation: With
these equations, a properly executed two rate test can provide the same
information that a build-up or drawdown can, without the loss of cash flow or
other associated concerns. The graphs below are Cartesian and Semi-log Plots
from a two-rate test in which the second rate is approximately 33% larger than
the first. Figure
1 – Cartesian Plot
Figure 2 – Semilog Plot with Radial Flow Identified
|